bitcoin
Bitcoin (BTC) $ 76,394.47
ethereum
Ethereum (ETH) $ 2,900.64
tether
Tether (USDT) $ 1.00
bnb
BNB (BNB) $ 601.28
xrp
XRP (XRP) $ 0.556952
cardano
Cardano (ADA) $ 0.397196
usd-coin
USDC (USDC) $ 0.999292
matic-network
Polygon (MATIC) $ 0.348901
binance-usd
BUSD (BUSD) $ 0.997689
dogecoin
Dogecoin (DOGE) $ 0.192505
okb
OKB (OKB) $ 40.20
polkadot
Polkadot (DOT) $ 4.16
shiba-inu
Shiba Inu (SHIB) $ 0.000019
tron
TRON (TRX) $ 0.160645
uniswap
Uniswap (UNI) $ 9.03
wrapped-bitcoin
Wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) $ 76,266.43
dai
Dai (DAI) $ 0.99899
litecoin
Litecoin (LTC) $ 72.06
staked-ether
Lido Staked Ether (STETH) $ 2,901.58
solana
Solana (SOL) $ 196.96
avalanche-2
Avalanche (AVAX) $ 27.63
chainlink
Chainlink (LINK) $ 12.64
cosmos
Cosmos Hub (ATOM) $ 4.56
the-open-network
Toncoin (TON) $ 4.96
ethereum-classic
Ethereum Classic (ETC) $ 20.24
leo-token
LEO Token (LEO) $ 6.25
filecoin
Filecoin (FIL) $ 3.79
bitcoin-cash
Bitcoin Cash (BCH) $ 385.12
monero
Monero (XMR) $ 165.62
Thursday, November 7, 2024
More
    bitcoin
    Bitcoin (BTC) $ 76,394.47
    ethereum
    Ethereum (ETH) $ 2,900.64
    tether
    Tether (USDT) $ 1.00
    bnb
    BNB (BNB) $ 601.28
    usd-coin
    USDC (USDC) $ 0.999292
    xrp
    XRP (XRP) $ 0.556952
    binance-usd
    BUSD (BUSD) $ 0.997689
    dogecoin
    Dogecoin (DOGE) $ 0.192505
    cardano
    Cardano (ADA) $ 0.397196
    solana
    Solana (SOL) $ 196.96
    matic-network
    Polygon (MATIC) $ 0.348901
    polkadot
    Polkadot (DOT) $ 4.16
    tron
    TRON (TRX) $ 0.160645
    HomeNewsArbitrum co-founder sees DAO decision on election drama as 'testomony to decentralization'

    Arbitrum co-founder sees DAO decision on election drama as ‘testomony to decentralization’

    It has been simply over a month for the reason that Arbitrum Basis drama, the place the muse transferred funds from Arbitrum DAO with out neighborhood approval, inflicting an outcry. However in case you ask Steven Goldfeder, CEO and co-founder of Offchain Labs, this blunder was simply one of many first steps within the journey to decentralization.

    In late March, Arbitrum’s decentralization mission hit a snag: its basis had supplied to maneuver 750 million ARB tokens, value round $1 billion on the time, into its personal wallets, however earlier than that the DAO couldn’t end voting on the proposal, the muse, a centralized entity, despatched itself nearly all of the tokens. It backfired when the neighborhood voted in opposition to the transfer.

    Predictably, this was not properly acquired by the neighborhood. In response, the Arbitrum Basis has proposed increasing price range oversight by ARB token holders in addition to their voting powers. On the time, the muse stated it might not transfer the 700 million ARB tokens that have been transferred to its administrative price range pockets till the neighborhood approves “an appropriate price range.” He additionally stated he would give you new actions to make DAO governance “extra accessible.”

    This was adopted by just a few rounds of voting by which the neighborhood accredited proposals concerning what would occur to the ARB tokens transferred into the muse’s pockets, and amendments to the DAO’s governance, structure, and bylaws.

    See also  Coinbase Inventory Drops After SEC Wells Advisory, Attainable Prelude to 'Enforcement Motion'

    The mud appears to have settled by now, however these occasions point out that the DAO’s governance voting mannequin is working (for now) and will result in better transparency and neighborhood management.

    For Goldfeder, the course of occasions, whereas damaging, in the end led to factor. “It is unlucky that that is the way it occurred,” Goldfeder stated. “The great intentions have been there and I hoped that the muse and the DAO neighborhood would resolve this drawback.”

    Goldfeder’s firm helped develop Arbitrum, a layer 2 scaling platform for Ethereum. He is additionally a launch companion and neighborhood member, however he was cautious to notice that he would not converse on behalf of the DAO or the muse.

    “If anybody had any qualms or questions on who’s in management there, this case made it clear to the muse and to Offchain (Labs) that the DAO is in management as a result of the very first governance proposal failed. It is arduous for anybody to get round it,” Goldfeder stated.

    RELATED ARTICLES

    LEAVE A REPLY

    Please enter your comment!
    Please enter your name here

    Most Popular