• Contingent staking is an non-obligatory characteristic, Charles Hoskinson reminds the Cardano neighborhood.
• The Cardano neighborhood stays polarized between being pro-CS and anti-CS.
• The CS proposal was submitted by Hoskinson following the SEC’s $30 million settlement with crypto alternate Kraken.

On February 21, Charles Hoskinson reaffirmed to the Cardano neighborhood that contingent staking is an non-obligatory characteristic. Hoskinson clarified that the characteristic shouldn’t be even on the CIP stage whereas praising the maturity of the Cardano neighborhood in direction of speech administration.

Notably, Hoskinson acknowledged the bittersweet progress of the Cardano ecosystem to be mature sufficient to disagree with a co-founder whereas feeling personally affected by feedback made about his position.

Intimately, Hoskinson’s tweet was in response to a member of the Cardano neighborhood publicly disparaging Hoskinson’s position as “accountability”. Neighborhood member @wuffet_barren tweeted the next in help of @cardano_whale who introduced a Twitter hiatus/pause following the contingent staking controversy.

Charles Hoskinson proposed the thought of ​​Contingent Staking as a means to assist the cryptocurrency market align with present SEC regulatory necessities. Particularly, the sample was raised after the U.S. Securities Change Fee (SEC) reached a $30 million settlement with crypto alternate Kraken for failing to register their platform’s staking trades. type.

Nonetheless, the cryptocurrency neighborhood has expressed criticism and opposition to Hoskinson’s mannequin. On February 16, Charles Hoskinson tweeted a thread discussing feedback and criticism in direction of CS.

The cryptocurrency neighborhood stays polarized on contingent staking. Some consider CS is a pathway to danger tolerance and belief regulators to guard traders. Whereas some like @cardano_whale consider implementing CS would enable governments to stifle and/or kill the cryptocurrency business.