• A crypto influencer believes the success of the XRP token is unrelated to Ripple.
• XRP ranks sixth among the many largest cryptos with a market capitalization of over $18 billion.
• Beforehand, a lawyer stated that greater than 12,000 XRP holders intervened within the XRP-SEC case.

In a latest tweet, a crypto influencer expressed skepticism about the way forward for the Ripple blockchain, given its protracted authorized battle with the US Securities and Trade Fee (SEC).

The crypto influencer expressed numerous perception within the success of Ripple’s utility token, XRP, and its ledger know-how, XRPL, slightly than the corporate itself. They argued that traders ought to look past Ripple’s on-demand liquidity (ODL) know-how and as an alternative give attention to the usefulness of the underlying digital asset.

In response to the tweet, one netizen expressed considerations that purchasing the XRP token exterior of the US was a lot simpler. Nevertheless, the coin stays an underperforming asset, in response to him, though Ripple has continued to develop its enterprise day by day with places of work world wide.

The crypto influencer stated the weak worth motion was because of solely a tiny fraction of the circulating provides XRP getting used. “Do not depend on Ripple,” he added.

Notably, the XRP Ledger (XRPL) is an open-source, permissionless, and decentralized know-how launched two years in the past to facilitate low-cost, scalable transactions. Based on market monitoring web site, CoinMarketCap, XRP ranks sixth among the many largest cryptos with a market share of over $18 billion.

Sadly, Ripple Labs, the creators of the XRP token, have been engaged in a authorized battle with the US SEC since late 2020 after the regulator labeled XRP a safety. Earlier this month, the US court docket dominated on either side’ motions, awarding victory to neither the plaintiff nor the defendants.

A professional-Ripple legal professional lately revealed that greater than 12,000 XRP holders have joined the movement to intervene within the ongoing lawsuit “to keep away from setting a nasty precedent.”